Bio-Rohkost-Produkte und mehr - kommt mit der Post! Heilung und Vorbeugung durch Nahrung - Regenbogenkreis - Lübeck - Versand: Ganz Europa

Rohköstlichkeiten Zuckerersatz (Xylit+Stevia) Regenwaldprodukte Algen (Ausleitung) Energetisierung von Wasser Bücher+DVDs (Kochen+Heilen)

         
   D 

Note: Cancer: chemotherapy against cancer = highly toxic combat agent mustard gas etc. 01
and destroys important parts of the body and body functions - death from cancer simply comes 2 years later - forbid chemotherapy
         

Face burnt by mustard gas, First World War [1] - poison gas attack causes temporary blindness, British soldiers blindfolded in a queue [2] - chemotherapy victim without hiar - chemotherapy often kills faster than cancer itself [5] - Patrick Swayze, chemotherapy victim before and after chemotherapy 1952-2009 [9] - Chris shows mutilated hands from chemotherapy [10]

Cancer heals with soda water + maple syrup / sugar molasses / Algarrobina / or with another syrup - healing rate is 90% - note sodium bicarbonate link

News

presented by Michael Palomino (2020)

Facts: Chemotherapy against cancer is a highly toxic mustard gas warfare agent etc. and kills EVERYTHING

WW1 1917-1918: Mustard gas used by the German army: eye damage, lung damage, burned skin

-- Mustard gas damages eyes, lungs and permanently corrodes the skin [web01]

-- In the First World War the German army first used chlorine gas in 1915 [web02], then from 1917 also "mustard gas", which was called "Lost" [web01,02], in addition the immediately deadly phosgene and combinations with phosgene were used, and also nettle substances were used (burns throat + lungs + skin), as well as white cross (causes blindness) [web02]

-- [The poison gas was used against the Belgians and the French and English in Belgium and France, but the wind often blew the mustard gas against the German soldiers too. Hitler was a victim of it and ended up in the hospital for 6 months in 1917 to be able to see again - and when he was released from the hospital, the Second German Reich was no longer there - you can read about that in his book Mein Kampf]

  
Mustard gas burns face, First World War [1] - poison gas attack causes temporary blindness, British soldiers blindfolded in line [2]

And now in the 1940s some "researchers" in the "USA" are making the propaganda that poison gas can be used against cancer tumors in order to cure cancer - because a few tumors shrink - but the treatment with poison gas kills the whole person then. Details:

"USA" 1942: Research with mustard gas against cancerous tumors
-- the research project of mustard gas from 1942 was a secret project of the "US" government [web01]
-- mustard gas is a weapon of mass destruction [web01 - Churchill wanted to depopulate Germany with mustard gas]
-- in 1942 2 "American" pharmacologists Louis Goodman and Alfred Gilman discovered at Yale University that mustard gas [in the laboratory] shrinks tumors [web01]

"USA" 1942: Alfred Gilman and Louis Goodman want to use mustard gas against cancer tumors [3]

-- in rabbits with mustard gas the number of white blood cells decreases [web01 - so: no defense any more!]
-- mice were manipulated with cancer, and the growth of the malignant tumors was slowed down with mustard gas [web01]

[But it's not said how long rabbits or mice survived].

August 27, 1942: First medical experiment with mustard gas and humans: cancer patient dies after 6 months
-- on August 27, 1942, Dr. Gustaf E. Linkskog made the first attempt with mustard gas on humans, a terminally ill patient with the initials J.D. with an aggressive lymphoma, labeled "hopeless" - the tumor shrank - but the patient J.D. still died 4 months later
-- the "scientists" continued their research with mustard gas against cancer [web01] [instead of researching in natural medicine!]

Gustaf E. Lindskog, portrait [4]

since 1946 approx.: The propaganda of mustard gas treatment as a new "chemotherapy" against cancer - gigantic profits
-- the "scientists" Goodman and Gilman now claimed that mustard gas was chemotherapy against cancer, and this propaganda spread all over the world [web01]

[although death from cancer was only delayed. Doctors, hospitals and pharmaceuticals make gigantic profits with chemotherapy].

The criminal chemotherapy kills some cancer cells, but also mucous membrane cells, hair root cells and blood-forming cells
-- Mustard gas is a cell poison, and further chemotherapies with other cell poisons are being developed, always with the idea that cancer cells should be killed or their growth inhibited. Tumor cells are genetically unstable and with a "high rate of division" and react "more sensitively than healthy tissue" - but normal cell types with a similarly rapid reproduction are also killed (mucous membrane, hair root cells, blood-forming cells) [web01]. Quote (translation):

"Most substances use the high division rate and genetic instability of tumor cells, which make them more sensitive than healthy tissue. However, normal cell types that multiply at a similar rate are also damaged: mucous membrane, hair root cells or blood-forming cells." [web01]

[Thus chemotherapy patients mostly lose all their hair and have to walk around bald].

A chemotherapy victim without hair - chemotherapy often kills the patient person faster than the cancer itself [5]

-- due to the increasing average age and increasing cancer rates in old age, the demand for cancer treatments grew [web01]

Resistance: Tumors develop resistance to chemotherapy and sometimes grow. stronger than before (!)
-- but sometimes resistances develop, some tumors become insensitive to chemotherapy over time, some tumors are completely insensitive,
a) because they consist of different tumor cells, one type of which is insensitive, and then precisely the insensitive, robust cell type continues to grow [web01]
b) because certain tumors absorb the chemotherapy substances but let them flow away again immediately [web01]. Quote (translation):

"One reason for this are the different cell types within a tumor, says Klaus Fenchel: "It can happen that some of the cancer cells are killed by the chemotherapy, but others not which have an additional genetic change." And exactly these robust cells will stay and will multiply. Some tumors also have mechanisms that render the chemotherapy ineffective, "by absorbing them up, but then sending them out again as if through a revolving door"."

Terrible side effects from chemotherapy - in some cases permanent nerve damage

Quote (translation):

"Heavy side effects are constantly feared which mostly are receding after the therapy, but unfortunately not in every case. These include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, tiredness, weakness, hair loss, nerve damage or changes in the blood count. Some cytostatics themselves can also promote the development of leukemia, but [pharma] experts rate the risk as low. Some patients suffer after their treatment a limitation of their cognitive abilities; this “chemo-brain” phenomenon is currently being intensively researched." [web01]

And:

-- the heart can be affected [web01]
-- The combined effects of the individual substances are unpredictable [web01]
-- many medical doctors don't know about soft treating methods (dosage), e.g. for preventing nerve damage and disorders of fine motor skills [web01]
-- medical doctors negletc further education [web01]

The worst side effect of chemotherapy: death from cancer just comes 2 years later
The worst side effect of chemotherapy is the short recovery time, because the cancer usually comes back stronger and then death simply occurs 2 years later. The cancer then comes back stronger because the ENTIRE body was damaged by the chemotherapy and because certain robust cancer cells multiply more [conclusion + observation by Palomino, cancer cures with sodium bicarbonate water + maple syrup / sugar molasses since 2015 - link].

Michael Palomino with Inca cross with mother earth and websites, healings with sodium bicarbonate since 2015 [6]

-- In 1967, Germany founded the first "Tumor Clinik" at the University Clinic in the town of Essen with the assistance of the German Cancer Society. This "Tumorklinik" meant that it could cure cancer with diagnoses and [isolated] therapies, and there was the merging of the "Inner Clinic" and "Radiotherapy" under one roof [web01]

-- the "Tumorklinik" propagates the chemotherapy in Germany, the doctors are trained in the "USA" [web01]

-- 1977: The "Tumorklinik" in Essen becomes the "West German Tumor Center" [web01]

[The principle is this: These tumor clinics in Europe propagate that a cancer patient is healed surviving 5 more years - this would be a healing. But there is nothing indicated about health of the patient person. "Healing" is stated also when the cancer patient remains with heavy handicaps and disabled...].

from the 2000s onwards: chemotherapy should be "more effective and more tolerable"
-- the chemotherapy doctors are proud of a high variation in chemotherapy. Quotes (translation):

"Chemotherapy become more effective and easier to tolerate with new substances and combinations. "50 years ago only a handful of substances were available, today we have a barely manageable number," Martin Schuler says, director of the internal clinic (tumor research) at the West German Tumor Center in Essen." [web01]

"In the meantime, there is usually not used just one drug, but a combination of several active ingredients; it is also known that it is not just the selection that matters, but also the dose, the sequence and the interval between two treatments. Chemotherapy is also not used only after an operation, but often also before it, to shrink a large tumor first and reduce the risk of metastases." [web01]

However, the pharmaceutical doctors remain hopeless and simply do not want to learn natural medicine against cancer, such as the director of the internal clinic (tumor research) at the West German Tumor Center in Essen:

<Martin Schuler: "There will probably never be a miracle cure against cancer."> [web01]
(orig. German: "Das eine Wundermittel gegen Krebs, das wird es wohl nie geben.")

BUT YES: Natural medicine has MANY cures for cancer - one of them is sodium bicarbonate water with maple syrup / sugar molasses taken on an empty stomach and 2 hours after the last meal during 12 days - the healing rate is 90% - link.

Chemotherapy against cancer is a gigantic fraud - see the slideshow with quotes from good cancer doctors - link.

Chemotherapy kills and the criminal toxic Pharma has got the PROFIT - with skull and bones [14]

========



Study by Dr. Hardin B. Jones 2012: Chemotherapy has a cure rate of only 2% - cancer patients often die quickly + cruelly - without chemo they live longer - natural medicine cures cancer:
2012: The terrifying study by Dr. Jones proves: Cancer patients without chemotherapy are living on of an average of 12.5 years, with chemotherapy only of an average of 3 years!
https://quantisana.ch/gesundheit-neu-denken/expertenberichte/erschreckende-studie-krebspatienten-sterben-mit-chemotherapie-schneller-als-ohne-behandlung/
   
Doctor Dr. Hardin B. Jones, portrait: chemotherapy kills [7] - Hardin B. Jones: early cancer detection is useless [11]

original English: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/shock-study-chemotherapy-backfire-cancer-worse-triggering-tumor-growth-article-1.1129897
published in: The New York Academy of Science.

Contact with the publisher Quantisana of this article about Dr. Hardin B. Jones:

QuantisanaProdukts & Finanz GmbH
Wartensee 2
(next to castle Wartensee)
CH-9404 Rorschacherberg - Switzerland

Telefon: +41 71 544 95 62
E-Mail: info@quantisana.ch

[Study by Dr. Jones from Berkeley]

<Breast cancer patients also survive four times longer without any conventional medical treatment than if they consent to treatment such as amputation, chemotherapy or radiation. California professor Dr. Jones of Berkeley found in a study spanning 25 years that chemotherapy, as terrible as the side effects, is not an effective cure for cancer.

But where do you find the results of such important studies in the media? - [Cure rate of chemotherapy against cancer is only 2%]

Persons being diagnosed of cancer often like to ignore the following facts: The pharmaceutical industry is an industry and, like any industry, is also about profits and not “just” about the well-being of the patient. Even doctors of conventional medicine know that chemotherapy is only effective in 2 percent of all types of cancer and yet it is the method of choice for all cancer patients for financial reasons.
 
A series of chemotherapy costs € 40,000 to € 60,000 - in Switzerland even a lot higher. In fact, highly effective alternative healing methods cost a tiny fraction of that. From a purely economic point of view, one can of course ask oneself, when the questino is about such sums of money, what counts life and suffering of the cancer patients when such profits are possible? 

[Cancer patients with chemotherapy also die quickly and cruelly - with natural medicine cancer patients live much longer or even cure cancer]

Also without this study from Dr. Jones we regret to have seen that cancer patients after a chemotherapy have died very fast and in a very crual way. Other people with cancer who managed themselves their healing have lived much longer and many of them have healed completely with alternative healing methods and the pharma doctors could only astonish.
 
[Chemotherapy propaganda in TV series - it's a crime]

The billion dollar pharmaceutical companies are trying everything to prevent such information from reaching the public. Our leading politicians seem to be in their hands. In the United States, popular TV series are used for making open propaganda for chemotherapy for cancer. I could just knock out every time when I see something like this ... If these studies are really representative and verifiable (and I don't doubt that!) then this should be considered as a crime.

Fortunately, more and more doctors in Germany and Switzerland who care more about the well-being of their patients than of a full wallet are offering very effective alternative healing methods against cancer. If you have cancer, visit these doctors and at least let them show you a different perspective. Only those who have heard both perspectives can make the right decision for themselves.

[Pharmaceutical medicine has NEVER lowered the cancer rate - mammography promotes breast cancer]

But please note: neither the rate of cancer nor the rate of breast cancer has ever been reduced by "advanced" medicine - on the contrary. One can almost advise women not to have a mammogram, because these rays are not beneficial to health either.
 

https://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/shock-study-chemotherapy-backfire-cancer-worse-triggering-tumor-growth-article-1.1129897     Medical doctor Dr. Hardin B. Jones, portrait [11] - Medical doctor Dr. Hardin B. Jones, elder portrait [13]

Aug.6, 2012: Study of Dr. Jones: Chemotherapy is killing also healthy cells - DNA damages - WNT16B protein provokes that cancer survives better! Aug.6, 2012: Shock study: Chemotherapy can backfire, make cancer worse by triggering tumor growth Long considered the most effective cancer-fighting treatment, chemotherapy may actually make cancer worse, according to a shocking new study. [Healty cells give a protein: tumors are growing, resistances are rising] The extremely aggressive therapy, which kills both cancerous and healthy cells indiscriminately, can cause healthy cells to secrete a protein that sustains tumor growth and resistance to further treatment. [Cancer cell dies in the lab - but not in the body] Researchers in the United States made the "completely unexpected" finding while seeking to explain why cancer cells are so resilient inside the human body when they are easy to kill in the lab. [Chemotherapy provokes DNA damages in healthy cells] They tested the effects of a type of chemotherapy on tissue collected from men with prostate cancer, and found "evidence of DNA damage" in healthy cells after treatment, the scientists wrote in Nature Medicine. [Chemotherapy destroys all fast-dividing cells] Chemotherapy works by inhibiting reproduction of fast-dividing cells such as those found in tumors [this means: mucous membrane cells, hair forming cells, and blood forming cells]. [Chemotherapy provokes secretion of protein WNT16B so cancer survives better!] The scientists found that healthy cells damaged by chemotherapy secreted more of a protein called WNT16B which boosts cancer cell survival. "The increase in WNT16B was completely unexpected," study co-author Peter Nelson of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle told AFP. The protein was taken up by tumor cells neighboring the damaged cells. "WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with nearby tumor cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist subsequent therapy," said Nelson. In cancer treatment, tumors often respond well initially, followed by rapid re-growth and then resistance to further chemotherapy. Rates of tumor cell reproduction have been shown to accelerate between treatments. "Our results indicate that damage responses in benign cells... may directly contribute to enhanced tumor growth kinetics," wrote the team. The researchers said they confirmed their findings with breast and ovarian cancer tumors. The result paves the way for research into new, improved treatment, said Nelson. "For example, an antibody to WNT16B, given with chemotherapy, may improve responses (kill more tumor cells)," he said in an email exchange. "Alternatively, it may be possible to use smaller, less toxic doses of therapy.">

========

Medical doctor Dr. Hardin B. Jones, portrait [11] - Medical doctor Dr. Hardin B. Jones, elder portrait [13] https://www.bol-chat.de/news/stravicno-profesor-s-berkeleya-ljudi-ne-umiru-od-raka-umiru-od-kemoterapije-i-to-u-strasnoj-boli?language=english (13.10.2017) fast wörtlich derselbe Artikel: https://phoreveryoung.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/berkeley-professor-states-people-do-not-die-of-cancer-people-die-of-chemotherapy-and-in-terrible-pain/ (19.7.2015)

Oct.13, 2017: Study of Dr. Hardin B. Jones: Chemotherapy is killing cancer patients in weeks or in 3 years - without chemo 12 years - chemo is pure cash: For twenty-five years I've been studying cancer patients and have come up with terrible conclusions! <Dr. Hardin B. Jones (link), a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of Berkeley, Calif., Studied the lifespan of cancer patients for over 25 years, when he came to the conclusion that chemotherapy does not work at all. He testified that a whole host of patients suffering from cancer and chemotherapy have died a terrible death. Also Dr. Jones warns that chemotherapy-treated patients die much faster and more painful than many other patients who have chosen another way of treatment. After extensive research, it came to the conclusion that chemotherapy shortens life and actually kills patients faster, and that it seems to be deliberate because billions are in the game that the "industry" of cancer spins within its network of deaths. [Chemotherapy provokes death after 3 years with guarantee] "People who refused chemotherapy treatment live an average of 12 and half years longer than people who are on chemotherapy," said Dr. Jones on her study, published in the New York Academy of Sciences journal (link). "People who have accepted chemotherapy die within three years of diagnosing at the latest, and a large number die right after a few weeks. " [3 or 12.5 years - 4times more WITHOUT chemo!] "Breast cancer patients who reject conventional therapy live four times longer than those who follow the system." "That's something you will not hear inside the mass media that will continue to convey myth that chemotherapy is the best medicine to fight cancer!" [Study 1979: Pharma breast cancer treatments have NO USE] A private study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1979 (link) revealed that many of the The most common procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, almost all of which are still used today, have not done anything to reduce the rate of breast cancer or to increase the survival of patients with breast cancer. [Studies IL1978+GB 1980: Pharma breast cancer treatments have NO USE] Two other studies, one from Israel published in 1978, and the other from Great Britain, published in The Lancet in 1980 (link), came to similar discovery. "The total survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved over the past 10 years, despite the increased use of multiple doses of chemotherapy for the treatment of metastases," explains the Lancet study, "The failure of chemotherapy in survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer." [Chemo patients die of chemotherapy] "The skill that is skillfully hidden is that many people who have" died of cancer "actually died of a treatment involving chemotherapy or radiation. Thus chemotherapy works by killing healthy cells of the organism before it is destroyed by cancer, which can develop very slowly, and even by natural means even stop and suppress it. Most cancer patients have died of malnutrition, because cancerous cells take nutrients from the blood and destroy the immune system, so it is weakened by an organism subject to many infections that are no longer able to defend themselves. Modern medicine has a cure for everyone, and the truth about cancer is skilfully hiding. ["USA": chemotherapy costs 300,000 to 1 million Dollar] Because the price of one treatment today is $ 300,000 to $ 1,000,000. [Dr. Allen Levin: Chemo is useless with breast, colon or lung cancer] "Most cancer patients die from chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not remove breast, colon, or lung cancer. This fact has been documented more than ten years ago, but doctors continue to persist in using chemotherapy for these tumors. "- Allen Levin, MD UCSF, "The Healing of Cancer ". Link German epidemiologist at the Mannheim Tumor Clinic in Heidelberg, Dr. Ulrich Abel, has done extensive research and analysis of each major study and clinical application of chemotherapy ever carried out in the world. His conclusions should be read by anyone who is going to be treated with chemotherapy, wrote in his book "The Doctor Within, Doctor at Home" by Dr. O'Shea.>

Video 7/30/2013: NEVER chemotherapy! Lifelong damage and high death rates

VIDEO: The rate of survival after chemotherapy within 5 years is NULL!
* squeeze down to the right "subtitles" for translation or squeeze "wheel" and select "Subtitle translation" *

    
Chris against chemotherapy, which provokes lifelong damage + deaths [8] - Patrick Swayze, chemotherapy victim before and after chemotherapy 1952-2009 [9] -
Chris shows mutilated hands by chemotherapy [10]

Video: Why I Refused Chemo for Cancer (8'50'')

Video: Why I Refused Chemo for Cancer (8'50'')
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txClgt_gZC8 - YouTube-Kanal: The Raw Life Health Show - hochgeladen am 30.7.2013

Minutes:

Video from Raw Life Health Show: Most people don't know how destructive chemotherapy is (9 ''). The truth is that chemotherapy agents poison all body cells (13 ''). So, the chemotherapy started as mustard gas (24 ''), that was in the 1950s after World War II, when researchers found that mustard gas suppressed the immune system when soldiers were exposed to mustard gas (34 ''). Then they thought that this could also be effective for lymphoma, a cancer caused by the immune system, with this project the chemotherapy started (40 ''). So that was mustard gas and its derivatives (variations), they then called it mustard gin (44 ''). So all people with a cancer diagnosis don't know how destructive chemotherapy really is (56 ''). Thus the warnings are simply not complete, but many effects are HIDDEN. There is indicated: cancer cells are killed, it can cause weakness, cause hair loss, cause loss of appetite, cause dizziness, cause vomiting, you can then feel bad, and it can suppress the immune system (1'13 ''). The conversation is then kept short, but the reality is that EVERY cell in the body is poisoned (1'20 ''). As a result, there are heaps of life-threatening problems such as brain damage, loss of hearing, peripheral neuropathy (nerve inflammation) with loss of feeling in the hands and feet (1'39 ''), it starts at the fingertips and then goes to the wrist (1'42 ''). I know people who have had chemotherapy and the hands of these victims are just mutilated (clenched), so they can no longer use their hands (1'47 '').

Chemotherapy contains cancer causin carcinogenic components (!)

People can no longer walk because they can no longer feel their feet (1'51 ''). Chemotherapy provokes damage to the spinal cord and the immune system (1'55 ''). The immune system is destroyed, the kidneys, the bladder system, so people have to live lifelong with diapers, also lung damage, heart damage, the poisoning goes from head to toe (2'8 ''). In addition, many components of chemotherapy are carcinogenic (carcinogens), which are listed as carcinogenic (2'21 '') by the National "US" Department of Toxicology (2'26 "). So these are carcinogenic, chemical substances, so not only the immune system is suppressed, but additional cancer is deliberately caused (2'36 ''). So chemotherapy PROVOCATES NEW CANCER (2'40 ''). But many cancer patients have no idea about medicine, and then the story is always the same: there is chemotherapy, there is surgery, there is chemotherapy, then tumors shrink a little or the cancer disappears, but only for a short time (2'55 ' '), but after a few months or in a year the cancer will come back (3'3' '), it will be worse and spread throughout the body (3'5' ') because the immune system is destroyed and because it is new cancer is provoked (3'16 '').

Cancer stem cells are NEVER killed by chemotherapy - cancer is growing always again and again

Well, the cancer stem cells are never killed by chemotherapy anyway because they are slow-growing cells (3'21 ''). So it happens as follows: After chemotherapy, the cancer stem cells survive and when the chemo is over, the immune system is also broken, and then the cancer that comes from the chemo itself can grow again (3'34 '') . So it's like an avalanche that comes then (3'36 '').

Rediculous healing rate of chemotherapy against cancer: 2.1%

Science says clearly that on average people still have 2.1 to 5 years to live after chemotherapy (3'49 ''). In 2004 a study came out examining 150,000 Americans and Australians, criteria were the 5-year survival rate and the different types of cancer (4'1 ''), and the result was that chemotherapy contributed only in 2.1% of the cases to a 5-year survival (4'11 ''). All other treatment methods together contribute to a 5-year survival in 60% of cases (4'16 ''). Chemo is only successful in 2% of cases for a 5-year survival (4'18 ''). The contribution is higher with a few types of cancer: with childhood leukemia, with some lymphomas, and with testicular cancer (4'30''). Large tumors responded least to chemo, and many types of cancer have 0 cases with chemotherapy with a 5-year survival (4'39 ''). But chemotherapy is still prescribed there too (4'42 ''). That doesn't make any sense, it's all just a gigantic money-grabbing system, the money and the lives of cancer patients are stolen (4'51 ''). The healthy immune system can recognize and eliminate cancer cells, that happens every day (5'2 ''). If you have cancer, your body is overflowing with toxins, nutrients are missing and the person concerned is under a lot of stress (5'12 ''). Cancer cure then goes with a change in diet, a change in life, you have to deal with problems, so you come back to a healthy life (5'25 '').

Radiation makes cancer cells up to 30 times stronger

Radiation is also terrible, so radiation can increase the harmfulness of cancer cells by 30 times (5'46 ''), can also cause cancer supercells, and a lot of other things are destroyed, first then the tumor is reduced, but then comes back stronger (6'14 ''), because the cancer stem cells are not killed, it only kills the daughter cells (6'22 ''). So reducing a tumor means nothing, with chemotherapy or radiation (6'30 ''), and the formulations are still so seductive with the claim: This special drug responds very well to your cancer type (6'43 ''). What does "respond" mean? 50% reduction in 4 weeks (6'52 ''). But that actually means nothing at all - so the formulations are so seductive, but in the end the whole pharmaceutical system is worth nothing (7'0 '').

Heal cancer

The primary remedies against cancer are nutrition and natural medicine, chemo is only the last choice (7'36 '').

The new low dose chemo is just another fraud

Now a new low-dose chemotherapy has been developed, the insulin potentiation therapy (7'48 ''). Insulin is the basis combined with 10% chemotherapy. The insulin causes the cancer cells to open, and then a low dose of chemotherapy comes and the cancer cell soaks it up immediately (8'3 ''). But even with this, tumors are only shrunk for a while (8'10 ''). So there are now holistic oncologists who use this low-dose chemo (IPT), with some success (8'22 ''). www.rawlifehealthshow.com Learn why Chris said no to chemo and went raw (8'28 '').

Comment: pharma oncologist with chemotherapy=murderers
Chemotherapy is a murder action and should be forbidden and the murderers have to PAY the victim families. They fill their pockets killing people systematicly and THEY KNOW.
Michael Palomino, Sep.22, 2020

========

Medical doctor Dr. Hardin B. Jones, portrait [11] - Medical doctor Dr. Hardin B. Jones, elder portrait [13] http://www.whale.to/cancer/jones_h.html - aus: Cancer Industry critics

Dr. Hardin B. Jones with clear facts against toxic pharma with cancer: Chemical pharmaceutical cancer treatment does not prolong life - manipulated statistics - from 1940 new definitions provoke many more cancer cases - preventive medical check-ups without use - breast cancer + cervical cancer operations shorten life: Hardin B. Jones, Ph.D. - book: "Report on Cancer" (1969) "My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live up to four times longer than treated individuals. If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery, other than when used in immediate life-threatening situations." ---Prof Jones. 1956 Transactions of the N.Y. Academy of Medical Sciences, vol 6. [Cancer patients without treatment live much longer] There is a fifty page article by Hardin Jones of National Cancer Institute of Bethesda, Maryland. He surveyed global cancer of all types and compared the untreated and the treated, to conclude that the untreated outlives the treated, both in terms of quality and in terms of quantity. Secondly he said, "Cancer does not cure". Third he said "There is a physiological mechanism which finishes off an individual". http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com/articles/medicalignorance.htm [1969: Dr. Jones with the book "A Report on Cancer"] Hardin B. Jones, Ph.D. "A Report on Cancer," paper delivered to the ACS's 11th Annual Science Writers Conference, New Orleans, Mar. 7, 1969. From: "The Hoax Of The "Proven" Cancer Cures" by G. Edward Griffin (chapter 10 from World Without Cancer by Edward Griffin) Surgery Statistics from Hardin B. Jones, Ph.D. - [Cancer treatments do NOT extend life of cancer patients] One of the nation's top statisticians in the field of cancer is Hardin B. Jones, Ph.D., former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California at Berkeley. After years of analyzing clinical records, this is the report he delivered at a convention of the American Cancer Society: In regard to surgery, no relationship between intensity of surgical treatment and duration of survival has been found in verified malignancies. On the contrary, simple excision of cancers has produced essentially the same survival as radical excision and dissection of the lymphatic drainage. That data, of course, related to surgery of the breast. (Hardin B. Jones, Ph.D. "A Report on Cancer," paper delivered to the ACS’s 11th Annual Science Writers Conference, New Orleans, Mar. 7, 1969.) [Pharma oncologists are manipulating the statistics in favor of toxic chemotherapy] Turning his attention to surgery in general, Dr. Jones continued: Although there is a dearth of untreated cases for statistical comparison with the treated, it is surprising that the death risks of the two groups remain so similar. In the comparisons it has been assumed that the treated and untreated cases are independent of each other. In fact, that assumption is incorrect. Initially, all cases are untreated. With the passage of time, some receive treatment, and the likelihood of treatment increases with the length of time since origin of the disease. Thus, those cases in which the neoplastic process progresses slowly [and thus automatically favors a long-term survival] are more likely to become "treated" cases. For the same reason, however, those individuals are likely to enjoy longer survival, whether treated or not. Life tables truly representative of untreated cancer patients must be adjusted for the fact that the inherently longer-lived cases are more likely to be transferred to the "treated" category than to remain in the "untreated until death."     The apparent life expectancy of untreated cases of cancer after such adjustment in the table seems to be greater than that of the treated cases. [Emphasis added] The answer is that they are not really lying-just bending the truth a little. In other words, they merely adjust the method of gathering and evaluating statistics so as to guarantee the desired results. In the words of Dr. Hardin Jones: Evaluation of the clinical response of cancer to treatment by surgery and radiation, separately or in combination, leads to the following findings: [The manipulation of the statistis - detail] The evidence for greater survival of treated groups in comparison with untreated is biased by the method of defining the groups. All reported studies pick up cases at the time of origin of the disease and follow them to death or end of the study interval. If persons in the untreated or central group die at any time in the study interval, they are reported as deaths in the control group. In the treated group, however, deaths which occur before completion of the treatment are rejected from the data, since these patients do not then meet the criteria established by definition of the term "treated." The longer it takes for completion of the treatment, as in multiple step therapy, for example, the worse the error.... With this effect stripped out, the common malignancies show a remarkably similar rate of demise, whether treated or untreated.17 [since 1940: new definition of cancer provokes more cancer cases] As Dr. Hardin Jones revealed: Beginning in 1940, through redefinition of terms, various questionable grades of malignancy were classed as cancer. After that date, the proportion of "cancer" cures having "normal" life expectancy increased rapidly, corresponding to the fraction of question-able diagnoses included.19 [Cancer investigation every year is of hardly any use - chemical pharma treatment of breast and cervix cancer shortens life!] One of the most publicized claims by The American Cancer Society is that early diagnosis and treatment increases the chance of survival. This is one of those slogans that drives millions of people into their doctors' offices for that mystical experience called the annual checkup. "A check and a checkup" may be an effective stimulus for revenue to the cancer industry but its medical value is not as proven as the hype would suggest. As Dr. Hardin Jones stated emphatically: In the matter of duration of malignant tumors before treatment, no studies have established the much talked about relationship between early detection and favorable survival after treatment.... Serious attempts to relate prompt treatment with chance of cure have been unsuccessful. In some types of cancer, the opposite of the expected association of short duration of symptoms with a high chance of being "cured" has been observed. A long duration of symptoms before treatment in a few cancers of the breast and cervix is associated with longer than usual survival.... Neither the timing nor the extent of treatment of the true malignancies has appreciably altered the average course of the disease. The possibility exists that treatment makes the average situation worse. 22

=====

Dr. Matthias Rath: June 19, 2022: Chemotherapy = mustard gas to sell unnecessary stocks from 1918

Video link auf FB: https://www.facebook.com/lucielle.klaus/posts/4031451953597022
Video link on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/9lDaNUyoaEJO/

Video: Dr. Matthias Rath on June 19, 2022: Chemotherapy=mustard gas+Rockefeller destroys natural medicine (9'27'') [16]

Video: Dr. Matthias Rath on June 19, 2022: Chemotherapy = mustard gas + Rockefeller destroys natural medicine (9'27'')
(orig. German: 19.6.2022: Chemotherapie=Senfgas+Rockefeller zerstört Naturmedizin (9'27'')

Video: Dr. Matthias Rath on June 19, 2022: Chemotherapy=mustard gas+Rockefeller destroys natural medicine (9'27'') (9'27'')
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9lDaNUyoaEJO/ - Bitchute channel: NatMed-etc. - uploaded on June 19, 2022

The pharmaceutical is the DEVIL - and the DEVIL of the pharmaceutical is called Rockefeller [and Bill Gates and Zuckerberg are from the Rockefeller family]. People are deliberately murdered with chemotherapy, and from 1918 they simply wanted to sell superfluous stocks of mustard gas. - And Rockefeller decided to design all universities for the pharmaceutical and to banish natural medicine from there.

Transcript (translation):

Question 1: Where does chemotherapy come from?
Moderator:
Dr. Rath, thank you very much for being able to be here today and for asking you a few questions for my channel "... of Truth" (7 '') - The first question would be: How did chemotherapy come about? Where does this chemotherapy come from? (17 '')

Bayer invented the combat gas "mustard gas" - and in 1918 the molecule was modified in a liquid which is killing cells
Dr. Rath:
Chemotherapy has its origin in chemical warfare. That sounds unusual, but that's exactly how it is (31 ''). In the First World War, the Bayer company developed the first weapons of mass destruction based on a chemical basis (43 ''). The first substance for this was a gas called "mustard gas" (53 ''). When the war was lost, the economic interest was still there to make money with this invention. The use of weapons of war was not possible in peace, so you could no longer make money. And the human body has been selected as a sales area (1'21 ''). And [it was] found that this basic substance, which was developed for the mass destruction of people, also kills cells (1'43 ''). This was then used to say: "Well, actually we could take this substance to combat cancer cells (1'59 ''). And the [transformed] gas shape was converted into a liquid. One atom in the molecule was changed, and from then on they were - the first group of chemotherapy agents was born (2'19 ''). And they were then systematically developed in the course of the first half of the last century [20th century 1918-1950] and they were called therapeutics of the first choice to combat cancer (2'34 '').

Chemotherapy kills ALL cells and usually kills people in one to two years
Chemotherapy should fight cancer in the human body, but had the same effect as the weapon of mass destruction called "mustard gas" (2'54 ''):
-- Killing of cells
-- Killing of organs.
And therefore, chemotherapy is - is NOT a form of therapy, but it got only the name of "therapy" (3'11 ''), but a - yes - this is just injecting poison into the human body (3'23 ''), an absurd form simulating that people would be helped (3'29 ''). And in reality, the whole principle has got it's base to poison the complete human body without any difference between cancer cells and healthy cells (3'39 ''), with the result that people who [make] chemotherapy usually will die within one or maximum two years (3'49 '').

Question 2: Why are the doctors so stupid and sell deadly chemo as a remedy?
Moderator:
How do you explain that chemotherapy has nevertheless prevailed worldwide and so many doctors propagate or apply chemotherapy, and that no patient or only a few patients say: "I don't want this!" (4'8 '') - How do you explain that doctors who have a mission [to heal] are using this? (4'15 '')

Criminal Rockefeller family has made trillions by oil business, destroys all natural medicine at universities+founded their own pharmaceutical universities
Dr. Rath:
Several factors play a role, partly in Europe, partly a development that we should briefly speak about in the "USA" (4'25 ''): There was an investment group with the Rockefeller family who made billions in the oil business (4'36'') which began in the middle of the 19th century (4'41 ''). And at the beginning of the 20th century they were so rich without end that they said: "We have to have this money work in a new area. We have the energy sector under our control, so we need a new investment area that is at least as big as the energy sector (5'1 ''). And they defined the human body as their marketplace (5'6 ''). There was a big problem, and that was that medicine was very strong at the time by Naturopathic approaches (5'18 ''). The first vitamins were discovered at the beginning of the 20th century, and the health meaning of vitamins was clear. So this investment group had to ensure that - first of all, this whole knowledge was eliminated (5'35 ''), from the universities, which then were transformed into educational institutions for the new investment business (5'45 ''). As a consequence, complete universities were founded as [the] Rockefeller University in New York [is] one of the large universities, or University of Chicago, all this [was] financed with money from the oil business (6'5 '').

Criminal Rockefeller family installs dogma+dictatorship: Only pharmaceutical drugs are accepted
The offers for work at these universities were changed: the interest of healing was no longer put in the foreground among the people who led these universities as doctors, but [the first priority of the selection] was: How well am I linked to the investment interests? (6'26 '') - The influence on the "American Medical Association" was systematically directed that a new dogmatic monopoly came up [dogma, dictatorship with narrative] in order to let win this this investment business with patented pharmaceutical drugs (6'48 ' ') eliminating all knowledge of naturopathic approaches calling and branding it as "medieval" but calling pharmaceutical investment business as "modern medicine" (7'2' ').

The lying name of the criminal Rockefeller family: poison pharma = "ethical medication"
To date, the patented pharmaceutical drugs in the "USA" are called "ethical drugs", so, these are considered "ethical medication" (7'15 ''), considering all others as unethical (7'20 ''). This is the way how this brainwash - this brainwashing [label swindle] did develop which was not by chance, but in the interest of this investment group [the criminal family Rockefeller] (7'31 ''). And after the First, but especially after the Second World War, this whole approach was systematically adopted in Europe (7'40 '').

The manipulation of the application criteria: "A lot of money" - the young adults are manipulated to the "money"+healing is NOT a topic
If you want to become the head of the cancer department at the University of Düsseldorf today, you must have three criteria:
1) You have to be a good researcher.
2) You have to be a good medical teacher. And - official criterion:
3) You have to bring a lot of money with you (8'2 '').
Where can you get money in the field of medicine? From the pharmaceutical industry (8'8 ''). This ensures that the pharmaceutical industry gets its own people into the future generation of doctors (8'24 '').

Pharmaceutical doctors become pharmaceutical sellers of the criminal Rockefeller family with sales strategies AGAINST the patients
This [future generation of pharma doctors] provides that the doctors leave the universities and treat the patients, applying dogmatically these sales strategies because they did not learn anything other during their medical studies (8'42 ''). And that's why we have a problem today that counts not only for Düsseldorf University, but also for 24 or 26 universities in Germany, and for 5,000 universities, medical universities worldwide (9'0''). The influence of the pharmaceutical industry [of the criminal Rockefeller family] on medical training is the most important individual reason in response to your question: How can it be that these helpless poison cures are still celebrated as a "gold standard" for the treatment of this disease? (9'24 '')

Thank you (9'25'')


June 2021
Somebody means:
Chris Müller

Hitler was selling the patent to the "USA". But he concealed that people died within 3 months. The substances of today are derivates of mustard gas of those times...
(orig. German: Hitler verkaufte das Patent damals an die USA.. Verschwieg aber, dass die Leute nach 3 Monaten verstarben.. Heutige Substanzen sind Derivate zum damaligen Senfgas...)

Source: conversation on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lucielle.klaus/posts/4031451953597022


=====

Conclusion: forbid chemotherapy - natural medicine has to get first priority


Michael Palomino with Inca cross with mother earth and websites, healings with sodium bicarbonate since 2015 [6]

Chemotherapy should be forbidden and natural medicine should finally be given first priority. Cancer heals with soda water + maple syrup / sugar molasses / algarrobina / or with just another syrup, the healing rate is 90% - note about sodium bicarbonate link
Further cancer healing methods in natural medicine can be found on the information sheet cancer heals - link
Blood group nutrition also cures cancer, just a little more slowly, and is a brilliant prevention - link
The general nutritional guidelines must be followed - link

Sources
[web01] Chemotherapie: Ein Kampfstoff als Lebensretter (19.1.2019): https://www.fr.de/ratgeber/gesundheit/kampfstoff-lebensretter-11087614.html
[web02] 100 Jahre Gaskrieg: „Ihre Lungen sind weg, buchstäblich ausgebrannt“:
https://www.welt.de/geschichte/article139907168/Ihre-Lungen-sind-weg-buchstaeblich-ausgebrannt.html

Photo sources
[1] Senfgas verätzt Gesicht, Erster Weltkrieg: https://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Was-ist-Senfgas-article2703081.html
[2] Giftgasangriff bewirkt vorübergehende Erblindung, britische Soldaten mit verbundenen Augen in der Warteschlange:
https://www.welt.de/geschichte/article139907168/Ihre-Lungen-sind-weg-buchstaeblich-ausgebrannt.html
[3] "USA" 1942: Alfred Gilman und Louis Goodman wollen Senfgas gegen Krebstumore einsetzen:
https://www.facebook.com/1179258622099552/posts/2360352507323485/
[4] Gustaf E. Lindskog, Porträt: https://www.facebook.com/1179258622099552/posts/2360352507323485/
[5] https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2018/02/09/nein-krebspatienten-sterben-mit-chemotherapie-nicht-schneller-als-ohne-behandlung
[6] Michael Palomino mit Inkakreuz mit Mutter Erde und Webseiten: Fotos von Michael Palomino
[7] Arzt Dr. Hardin B. Jones von Berkeley, Porträt: http://www.whale.to/cancer/jones_h.html

[8] Chris gegen Chemotherapie, die lebgenslängliche Schäden+Tote provoziert: Video: Why I Refused Chemo for Cancer (8'50'')
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txClgt_gZC8 - YouTube-Kanal: The Raw Life Health Show - hochgeladen am 30.7.2013

[9] Patrick Swayze, Chemotherapie-Opfer vor und nach der Chemotherapie 1952-2009: Video: Why I Refused Chemo for Cancer (8'50'')https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txClgt_gZC8 - YouTube-Kanal: The Raw Life Health Show - hochgeladen am 30.7.2013

[10] Chris zeigt verstümmelte Hände durch Chemotherapie: Video: Why I Refused Chemo for Cancer (8'50'')
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txClgt_gZC8 - YouTube-Kanal: The Raw Life Health Show - hochgeladen am 30.7.2013

[11] Arzt Hardin B. Jones, Porträt: http://www.whale.to/cancer/jones_h.html
[12] Dr. Hardin B. Jones: Krebsfrüherkennung ist nutzlos: https://www.slideshare.net/MarkSloan21/25-shocking-quotes-about-cancer (Foto Nr.3)
[13] Dr. Hardin B. Jones Porträt: https://www.slideshare.net/MarkSloan21/25-shocking-quotes-about-cancer (Foto Nr.3)
[14] Chemotherapie tötet und die kriminelle Gift-Pharma hat den Gewinn - mit Totenkopf+Knochen:
https://www.uihere.com/free-graphics/search?q=skull+and+Crossbones

          

^