D - ESP - F  
<<       >>

HELL IS HERE - and all are only watching

40. Atomic plants and the consequences - part 22: Dumping of nuclear waste in the sea by GB + F - video log

Toxic waste is not the same as radiation - radiation does not dilute - dumping of radioactive waste since around 1940 all around the UK to Morocco and the Canary Islands - La Hague + Sellafield contaminate the entire Atlantic around Europe - and NOBODY wants to pay!

      
Nuclear waste dumping in the open sea: Here nuclear waste barrels hang on the ship's crane, with the symbol "radioactive" [6]
Map of Europe + Africa with the nuclear waste dumping sites in the Atlantic and in the English Channel -
according to the map, the Irish Sea is not affected by atomic barrels - but there is Sellafield! [21]
GB: Nuclear waste dumping site "Hurd Deep" in the English Channel, there is an intact nuclear waste barrel, side view [31]

      
Greenpeace fights with dinghies against the nuclear waste dump 02, one of Greenpeace's dinghies, 1975ca. [8]
Alderney Island, the rattling Geiger counter shows radioactivity on the beach [44]
Sellafield region: children with blood cancer leukemia, a list on GB-TV 1980s [80]

presented by Michael Palomino (2021)

40. Atomic plants and the consequences - part 22: Dumping of nuclear waste in the sea by GB + F - video log

Video: The truth about nuclear waste disposal [Documentation German] (50min.)
(orig. German: Die Wahrheit über die Atommüllentsorgung [Doku deutsch]

Video: Die Wahrheit über die Atommüllentsorgung [Doku deutsch]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch2QpUGPTQs - YouTube-Kanal: Nikki Johnston - hochgeladen 7.2.2021

Here is the
Video log

Steel barrels with nuclear waste on a truck [0a] - [observation: radioactive signal is missing!]

[Here are coming some barrels on a truck and on the roadside a group of people are demonstrating with a Dutch banner against dumping of nuclear waste in the sea. Only in about 1975 the topic was a public concern after Greenpeace made action against the criminal atomic industry].

Film speaker: It was dumped all what was radiating, in such barrels made of steel (11''). What was in them? Low-level radioactive waste from hospitals (19''), but also radioactive waste from Europe's nuclear facilities (24''). For decades [since 1940 appr.] , the nuclear industry has used the sea as a repository (29'').


Protesters in Holland near a street with a banner against nuclear waste dumping into the sea "Geen Atomabval de Zee In" [0b]


from 1945: The satanist propaganda, nuclear waste and nuclear radiation would "dilute" - over 100,000 tons of nuclear waste sunk in front of GB + F + Sp + N-Africa

Film speaker: May 1967: In the port of Emden in Lower Saxony, nuclear waste from Germany, Great Britain and France is loaded (42'') onto the English cargo ship "Topaz" (45"). The barrels should be dumped at a depth of at least 4000m (49''). [Propaganda says]: The nuclear waste would dilute in the water (52''). This is considered safe (54'').

[Any long-term test is missing! - Committee of 300 in London: Nuclear waste = dilutes - Secret plan: Reduction of the population with cancer epidemics
The industrialists and the corrupt governments just claim something. But there is no long-term test of how radioactive waste behaves in water - e.g. in a swimming pool - and whether genetic damage then occurs in fish and whether fish remain radioactive in the dishes. Everything is done WITHOUT a long-term test. The European media controlled and censored by Rothschild must officially downplay radioactive waste. During this period in the 1960s, atomic bombs had to be declared "good" and nuclear power plants had to be declared "good". The radioactive waste is kept secret. One can assume, however, that population reduction through contamination was planned already in those times].

  
There are nuclear waste barrels in a ship [1] - There are workers WITHOUT protective suits at the nuclear waste barrels in the ship [2]

Here is an example of what happened with atomic wasate barrels under Churchill governments in England, and under the Schmidt and Kohl governments in Germany etc.:


Port of Emden in Germany on the North Sea: There are nuclear waste barrels hanging on the crane, which are loaded onto the ship [3]

  
The ship is called "Topaz", the lettering [4] - The ship Topaz is going out to sea with German, British and French nuclear waste [5]

[From 1940 approx. until 1993 this is the STANDARD to "get rid of" nuclear waste in the Atlantic WITHOUT getting rid of it! Involved are the Masonic governments Adenauer, Erhard, Brandt Schmidt, Kohl, De Gaulle, D'Éstaing, Chirac, Reagan, Ford, Johnson, Churchill, Furgler, Gnägi, all royal families etc.].

La Hague (Western France): The pipe end of the radioactive sewer pipe of the nuclear waste reprocessing plant - customers: F, B, NL, CH, J, D [50]

Film speaker: The British crew of the "Topaz" is dumping the radiant cargo into the sea (1'0''). More than 100,000 tons of nuclear waste disappear in this way (1'4''): in the north-east Atlantic, in the Irish Sea, but also in the shallow British Channel (1'11'').

[Observation: According to the map (Photo 21), the Irish Sea is NOT affected by sunk nuclear waste barrels, but sites in the Atlantic off France, Spain, Portugal and off North Africa off Morocco and the Canary Islands (Canarias). The Irish Sea is later totally atomically contaminated by the radioactive drainage pipe of the Sellafield reprocessing plant].


Nuclear waste dumping in the open sea: Here nuclear waste barrels hang on the ship's crane, with the symbol "radioactive" [6]

Map of Europe + Africa with the nuclear waste dumping sites in the Atlantic and in the English Channel -
According to the map, the Irish Sea is not affected by atomic barrels [21]

1970s: Greenpeace blows up the criminal-satanist nuclear industry by dumping nuclear waste in the sea - action with rubber dinghies

[Greenpeace took great action in the mid-1970s to blow up this criminal dumping of nuclear waste in the sea, which the satanist Masonic governments had previously kept secret].

Film speaker: Then, in the mid-1970s: Greenpeace first drew attention to this dumping with actions (1'27''). An outcry goes through Europe (1'30'').


Greenpeace fights with rubber dinghies against the nuclear waste dump 01 with a ramp on the ship, 1975ca. [7]


Greenpeace fights with dinghies against the nuclear waste dump 02, one of Greenpeace's dinghies, 1975ca. [8]

Film spokesman: 32 years after the boat operations in the Atlantic, we meet two of the activists from back then at Greenpeace in Hamburg (1'49'').

     Oh Harald, hello (1'53'').

Harald Zindler and Roland Hipp have not seen each other for many years (1'56''). Both fought against the sinking out of conviction (2'0''). We show Harald Zindler the video recordings. Even today, years later, it runs cold down his back (2'10''). But the nuclear industry was not impressed by the Greenpeace actions (2'19''). The dumpings continued (2'21''). The environmentalists were criminalized and fought (2'25'').


Greenpeace fights with rubber dinghies against the nuclear waste dump 03, nuclear waste barrels fall into the sea - 1975 approx. [9]


Greenpeace Hamburg, Harald Zindler 2013 approx., He was there against the dumping of nuclear waste in the mid-1970s [10]

Harald Zindler: We were captured (2'37'') on the ship and locked in the forecastle (2'40''). And then the dumping went on, we heard that (2'43''). And then what happened, you just saw that another rubber dinghy was hit (2'48''). And then the action was canceled, that was too dangerous or the people were then slightly injured (2'55'') or could have been killed (2'57'').

Someone curses the nuclear contamination ship of the criminal nuclear industry:

Are you happy now? You are an asshole! (3'3'')


Nuclear waste dumping in the open sea and the curse [11]

Film speaker: These events were more than 3 decades ago (3'6''). What has happened to the nuclear waste down there on the ocean floor since then? (3'9'') - HE KNOWS MORE about it (3'12''). In London we meet John Large, a nuclear physicist (3'16''). He was involved in the development of a British atomic bomb in the 1960s (3'20'') and knows a lot about the dumping actions, especially those of the military (3'25''). Large has an extraordinary souvenir (3'28''): a non-radiating fuel rod from the Sellafield nuclear plant (3'32''). Such fuel rods were sunk in the depths (3'35''). The man tells us surprising things (3'41'').


John Large, atomic physicist [12]


The radiation dose on the nuclear waste ship: Often the nuclear waste is dumped under time pressure "no matter where"

John Large, atomic physicist: The sailors on board were exposed to the radioactivity from the barrels on board without protection [without protection suit - for simulating that the atomic barrels would be "harmless"!] (3'51''). The longer they got the radiation, the more urgent it became for the captain to reach the assigned dump site (3'58''). If the ship was delayed due to bad weather, the captain was no longer interested in reaching the exact destination (4'9''). When the men and he himself had reached the maximum radiation dose, the dumping came: Down! No matter where (4'16''). In other words: There is absolutely no certainty whether the map details are correct at all (4'22'').


Sailors on a nuclear waste ship WITHOUT protective suits [13]

Film speaker: How are such barrels ever supposed to be found? (4'29'') - For example control measurements must be (4'32'').

  
A nuclear waste barrel falls on the sea floor in the sea [14] - A nuclear waste barrel hits the sea floor in the sea [15] - [observation: radioactive signal is missing!]


Dump location: "Unknown" - Dump depth: "Unknown"

Film spokesman: A look at the official British sinking maps reinforces the doubts about the correctness of the information (4'40''). Under "Coordinates" or "Depth" is often found the entry "Not known" (4'46''). Even worse, also the indications about radiation are defined again and again as "Not known" - "Not known" - "Not known" (4'54'') - this is just one of the directories of dumps in the Irish Sea (4'59'').

  
Documents: The depth of the nuclear waste dump is partly unknown: "not known" [16]
Documents: The radioactive radiation from nuclear waste containers is partly unknown: "not known" [17]

[Shallow Irish Sea
The Irish Sea is no more than 160 meters deep. The Irish Sea is an average of 52m deep - hardly suitable for dumping nuclear waste, not even according to the criteria at that time [web01]].

Map of Europe + Africa with the nuclear waste dumping sites in the Atlantic and in the English Channel -
According to the map, the Irish Sea is not affected by atomic barrels [21]

London: The health authority does not want to investigate

Film speaker: Who could know where the barrels are? (5'7'') - Maybe the British health authority "Health Protection Agency" HPA (5'12''), because it is responsible for radioactive residues (5'16''). We learn to know Dr. John Cooper, head of the department "Dangers of Radioactivity" (5'26''). He knows very well the problem of sunk nuclear waste barrels (5'30''). Can it really be that the maps with duping sites are faulty? (5'35'')

John Cooper: I would be amazed if the maps were incomplete or inaccurate (5'44''), but of course you can never rule that out completely (5'46'').

Film Team Member: The British military also dumped and never reported anything to the authorities. How do you deal with these files? (5'54'')

John Cooper: Well, from a certain point of view one just has to believe the information (5'59''). [or you will be fired by the satanic Queen because of nest pollution!]


John Cooper from the British Health Service HPA [18]


Sellafield (GB):

Film speaker: The British nuclear center Sellafield, formerly Windscale (6'9''). Nuclear waste also came from here and disappeared in the Irish Sea, in the English Channel, in the Atlantic (6'16''). The suspicion: highly radioactive nuclear waste could have been dumped (6'25''). That was officially prohibited (6'31'').

  
GB: Sellafield (previously Windscale), the nuclear waste processing plant [19] - GB: Sellafield (previously Windscale), the nuclear waste processing plant, general view [20]


John Large, atomic physicist: If you look at the maps with the analyzes of the material, namely those of the barrels (6'40'') - this is not about atomic bomb tests (6'42'') - then there is for me no doubt (6'44''): Highly radioactive waste was thrown into the sea (6'47'').

Film speaker: That would mean that the maps would be wrong on this point (6'57''). How could such mistakes come about? (7'1'') - Are they mistakes at all, or was it intent? (7'5'')


Map of Europe + Africa with the nuclear waste dumping sites in the Atlantic and in the English Channel [21]

Film spokesman: Michael Meacher (1939-2015 [web05]) could know more about this. He was British Environment Minister from 1997 to 2003 and was critical about dumping policy (7'24''). Today [movie production in 2013 appr.] the once longest-serving minister in Tony Blair's cabinet is a simple member of parliament (MP) (7'40''). We show him the maps (7'47''). Who gave false information? (7'50'') Who knew anything about the dumping action at all? (7'55'')


GB: Michael Meacher, Environment Minister in the Blair government (1939-2015 [web05]) [22]

Michael Meacher: I'm afraid there was an agreement between the Ministry of Defense, the army and the nuclear industry [and the satanist Queen with the House of Lords!] (8'7''). Nobody should know about the dumps (8'9''). Therefore it is impossible today to find out where and, above all, what exactly was sunk (8'15''). We know roughly where what is, but again: We don't know exactly where (8'21''), and we certainly don't know how much (8'23''). As a result, we cannot say anything precise about the effects (8'26''), which have to be considered in decades or even in centuries (8'30''). In my eyes that was a kind of conspiracy (8'37'').

Film spokesman: Even Greenpeace did not suspect that it would be so bad at the time (8'48''). But the protests were successful (8'51'').


from 1993: Official ban on international dumping of nuclear waste in the sea

Film spokesman: In 1993, the dumping of nuclear waste was banned worldwide (8'57''), Greenpeace activists were celebrated like heroes (9'0''), for example here in Vigo, Spain (9'3''). Nuclear waste barrels had been dumped into the sea for more than half a century [i.e. since around 1940] (9'11''), following the motto of the time: "The solution of pollution is dilution." (9'18'') - The solution to the problem is dilution (9'22'').

[This was propaganda of the satanic Freemasons' Committee of 300 in London, alcoholics and drug addicted with billions in their hands and with the Queen as the boss!]

  
Vigo (Spain) 1993, entry of the Greenpeace ship [23] - Vigo (Spain) 1993: Greenpeace victory, the dumping of nuclear waste is banned internationally [24]


John Large, atomic engineer: There is a fundamental problem (9'30''): One thought that if you threw radioactive waste into the sea and diluted it with 1000s and 1000s of liters of water (9'38''), it would be safe, the poison would disappear (9'40''). That has been proven wrong, many, many times (9'50'').

[Because radiation does NOT dilute. There was no field test in the swimming pool with fishes and a bit of nuclear waste].


Mid-1980s: Expedition with German research ship "Walter Herrwig" - 9 atomic barrels lifted: Plutonium everywhere in the water, in the seabed, in the fish

Film spokesman: Experts obtained the first evidence that the highly radioactive contaminated site does not simply disappear through dilution from an exploration trip in the mid-1980s (10'2''). Germany sent the research ship "Walter Herrwig" to the Atlantic sinking areas (10'8''). The drop points were examined (10'11''). The scientists accidentally brought nine barrels on board (10'16''). The researchers found plutonium in the water, in the seabed and in fish (10'25'').

[It is strange that the researchers do NOT wear protective suits when they bring up 9 radioactive barrels from the sea floor. Something is not right. But the radioactive symbol is right! - And with this action IT'S PROVED: IT'S EASY TO TAKE THE ATOMIC BARRELS OUT OF THE SEA!]


Mid-1980s: A nuclear waste barrel lifted from the ocean floor [25]


Mid-1980s: Nuclear waste barrels from the ocean floor [26]

Film spokesman: In internal papers of the Atomic Energy Agency IAEA it says:

"Increased plutonium concentrations in the dumping areas indicate plutonium from leaks in the barrels." (10'42'')

So the poison has arrived in the biosphere (10'50'').


GB: Position paper on nuclear waste disposal from 2010: "Position paper on the implications of deep sea disposal of radioactive waste" [27]


Film speaker: Monaco, seat of the marine laboratory of the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) (11'8''). Here biologists are researching the dangers of nuclear waste in the sea (11'13''). This is the head of the lab, Dr. Hartmut Nies (11'16''). The experts feed marine animals with contaminated food (11'28''). They want to know how this affects the organisms (11'31''). Dr. Nies and his colleagues are also responsible for the sunk nuclear waste barrels (11'37''). The key question [is]: What about the barrels? (11'43'') Are there still intact barrels down there after all these years, or are they rusted? (11'49'')


Hartmut Nies from the Atomic Energy Agency in Monaco [28]

[Monaco is the second center of the criminal Vatican Lodge P3 (previously P2), which has dumped nuclear waste in South of Italy since 1989 since the fall of the Iron Curtain. Mr. Nies thinks that the barrels have probably all "dissolved" in the sea water ...]

Hartmut Nies: The seeground is constantly investigated (11'53'') and then certain barrels would have been noticed if you had had them (11'57'').

Film team: So you are assuming that the barrels in the English Channel must all be rusted or gone? (12'5'')

Hartmut Nies: Eh, I actually assume that (12'7'').

Film team: And if you found intact barrels now, would it be better to salvage them? (12'12'')

Hartmut Nies: If I don't have a lot of effort, of course, get them out, of course (12'16'').

Film speaker: There have been no new investigations in the dumping areas for 12 years (12'23''). Is Nies right? (12'26'') Are all the barrels rusted [and have dissolved in the sea water]? (12'28'') - We decide to look for it ourselves (12'33'').


The dumping site of "Hurd Deep" for nuclear waste in the English Channel - right next to the British Channel Islands - over 28,000 barrels with radioactive waste dumped

[This nuclear waste dump is only 90 to 140 meters deep and is right next to the British Channel Islands. And the consequences for the island's population are correspondingly heavy with endless cancer].

Film speaker: The only sinking area within reach of our means and possibilities is "Hurd Deep" (12'40 "), an underwater channel in the middle of the British Channel near the Channel Islands (12'47").


Map of the English Channel with the dumping site "Hurd Deep" for nuclear waste near the British Channel Islands (!) [29]

Film speaker: We chartered a boat (12'53''). Hurd Deep is about 10 nautical miles northwest of the channel island Alderney (12'59''). A small submarine is supposed to provide us with video images (13'4''). The device is difficult to maneuver because the English Channel is known for its extreme currents (13'10''). The Greenpeace fighter Harald Zindler is on board (13'14'').


Harald Zindler: If we make the funds available now, I would immediately fetch a barrel and bring it to precisely those responsible who did it (13'24''). It's irresponsible. Here 28,000, more than 28,000 barrels of nuclear waste were dumped (13'31''). It's unbelievable (13'33'').

Film speaker: The specialty of Hurd Deep: Here 1000s of barrels of nuclear waste are not stored in 5000 meters, but just 100 meters deep (13'43''). We are more and more nervous. According to the map, there are World War I ammunition and nuclear waste down there (13'59''). What will we find? (14'3'') [Now a camera with remote control is put in the sea]. On the first dive we film a nuclear waste barrel, intact (14'34'').


GB: Nuclear waste dumping site "Hurd Deep", there is an intact nuclear waste barrel [30]


GB: Atommüllversenkungsstelle "Hurd Deep", da liegt ein intaktes Atommüllfass, Seitenansicht [31]

[Algae are covering the nuclear symbol as it seems or there was never one as it's often the case].

So there are still intact barrels down there that could be salvaged (14'38''). Of course we are not allowed to get the barrel up (14'41'').

On the second dive we also discover this completely rusted barrel (14'52''). The find does not leave Harald Zindler indifferent up in the boat (14'57'').


GB: Nuclear waste dumping site "Hurd Deep", there is a rusted, open nuclear waste barrel [32]

Harald Zindler: What makes me - the special thing is that we can find these barrels very close by here on land at a depth of 90 to 140m, where we see here Alderney [Island], where we see France there, yes (15'10 '' ). And where we can reach practically in half an hour by ship (15'15'').

[The radioactivity of the nuclear waste is leaking heavily from such rusted barrels. The radioactivity is NOT diluted, but is absorbed by the fish and spread until the fish ends up in the fish market and on the plate and then also contaminates people. For example, the population of Alderney is radioactively contaminated]:


Alderney Island with physicist Chris Busby: The radiation: contaminated fish, contaminated food, leukemia and cancer etc.

Film speaker: We're going back to Alderney (15'20''). What does our find mean for the inhabitants of the island? (15'27'')


The British Channel Island Alderney Island, view of the coast line [33]

  
Alderney Island, view from above [34] - Alderney Island, the airfield [35]

Film speaker about Dr. Busby: On the approach to Alderney [sitting in a small plane] Professor Chris Busby [is arriving] (15'38''). The physicist (and chemist [web02]) was here already decades ago (15'42''). At that time a doctor asked him to come (15'45''). There are an unusually high number of cancer cases on the island (15'48''). Busby has been fighting the dangers of nuclear radiation for many years (15'52''). He is considered an "enfant terrible", inflexible and uncomfortable (15'56''), someone whom the authorities prefer to stigmatize than to hear his pointed estimations (16'1'').


Film speaker about Alderney: Alderney is a peaceful place (16'6''). The clocks tick more slowly here than elsewhere (16'9''). 2400 people are living here (16'12''). The island is also a refuge for well-heeled British pensioners (16'27'').

  
Alderney Island, main street photo 1,2 [36,37]

Film speaker: But the place is possibly not as idyllic as it seems at first glance (2 children are building a sand castle on the sandy beach) (16'43'').


Alderney Island, a beach [38]

Film speaker: To our surprise, Busby first goes to the cemetery with us (16'54''). ONe has to look for the victims, so his thesis (16'58''). That says more than any radiation limit value (17'2'').

Prof. Busby: You only need to find one single case of childhood leukemia and we have an answer (17'12''). For the size of this island, ONE case is TOO MUCH already (17'14'').

Film speaker: We are trying to find out whether there really is an increased number of leukemia deaths (17'27''). But the British state [satanist Queen!] keeps the exact dates under lock and key (17'31 ") [with the argument] data protection [this is how the satanic royals rule] (17'33"). Maybe we can find data on the island (17'36'').

  
Activist Chris Busby in the cemetery of the island of Alderney [39] - Activist Chris Busby in the cemetery of the island of Alderney at sunset, deceptive romance [40]

[All you have to do is ask the residents of Alderney Island and they'll tell you about the many cancer cases on the island]:

Film spokesman: We are just asking haphazardly in the residential area next to the cemetry what are the causes of death (17'41'').

Islander Claire Vincent: The wife of an official on the island died of a brain tumor (17'53''). And then his second wife fell ill with a brain tumor (17'56''), but she is probably healthy now (17'58''). And then we happened to watch a series on TV (18'5''). There they showed live operations (18'7''). And there they showed a man from whom they removed a brain tumor, and he came from Alderney (18'12''). He died last year (18'15'').

[Conclusion: The people of Alderney are test subjects for "high surgeons" in London].


Testimony from Mrs. Claire Vincent on Alderney Island, she tells about cancer cases on the island [41]

Islander Claire Vincent: And I think there is another child, at least one child, with a brain tumor (18'20''). We want to leave the island (18'22''). We're going back to England (18'24'').

Film speaker: Statistically that would be very noticeable (18'29''). But the authorities [of the satanic Queen!] only ever say one thing to Chris Busby (18'33 "): "Everything is fine" (18'35").


Alderney Island: radioactivity measured on the beach - the soil samples on the beach at low tide with seaweed

[On Alderney Island, activist Busby goes down to the beach and wants to take a soil sample from the beach, it should be the beach plants that are underwater at high tide. Therefore, he has to wait until the ebb, which only comes in the late evening when the sun is already gone].

Film speaker: The professor goes to the beach with us (18'44''). He wants to measure radiation (18'46''). The responsible [satanist Queen] British authorities argue that the amount and radiation strength are far too low to endanger people (18'54'').

Prof. Busby: We have known since the 1980s that dumped material that was thrown into the sea comes back (19'10''). Very little particles are binding the radioactive particles on the sea floor (19'14''). The plutonium, the cesium and all the other substances (19'18'').

Film speaker: Professor Busby wants to go further outside (19'25''). The evening is coming - and the ebb (19'28''). Busby criticizes the [satanic Queen] authorities for not taking their own measurements (19'34''), but only estimating the radioactivity, out there in Hurd Deep (19'40'').

  
Alderney Island, a soil sample is now being taken on the beach [42]

Prof. Busby: I think we're going to find cesium 137, rutenium 106, a lot of plutonium here (19'50'').

Film team: Plutonium? So that could be quite poisonous (19'53'').

Prof. Busby: Of course (19'56'').

Film speaker: Chris Busby's gamma spectrometer measures increased radiation at this point (20'2'').

Prof. Busby: 184 - 204 (20'7'')


Alderney Island, activist Busby measures radioactivity on the beach [43]

Prof. Busby: An unbelievable amount came from Hurd Deep, especially enriched uranium (20'14''). It is possible that the radiation came from Hurd Deep (20'17'').

Film speaker: We also measure with our Geiger counter (20'23''). [The Geiger counter rattles]. It's true: The radiation is increased (20'26'').


Alderney Island, the Geiger counter shows radioactivity on the beach and rattles [44]

Film speaker: How dangerous is that for the people here on Alderney Island? (20'30'')

Prof. Busby: Only ONE damaged cell is needed. It affects a neighboring cell and another one, and another one (20'38''). Every dose, from the first radiating particle on, can cause cancer (20'42'').

Film speaker: Is Busby right? The outsider? (20'54'') - And shouldn't the undamaged barrels be recovered to be on the safe side? (20'57'')

[Well, the damaged barrels should be recovered first! Robot submarines can do that - it's not that difficult!]


London (satanist royals): Dr. Cooper downplays the danger of Hurd Deep - he leaves the barrels down!

Film speaker: What does the Head of the UK Health Department say, Dr. Cooper? (21'2'')


Dr. Cooper: I don't think the barrels in Hurd Deep pose a great risk (21'10'').

Film team: Even if they [the radioactive barrels] are only 100 meters deep? (21'12'')

Dr. Cooper: Of course it's something you wouldn't do today (21'15''). The best solution to this problem: We leave the barrels down (21'19'').

Film spokesman: We ask the responsible atomic energy authority (21'26''). How do you assess the dangers of dumped barrels there? (21'30'')


Monaco IAEA (satanist Vatican Lodge P3): Diluted radioactive water can be taken as drinking water, says the IAEA boss Nies


Hartmut Nies (IAEA in Monaco - [second seat of the Vatican Lodge P3]): We have seen that the dilution capacity in the sea is so enormous (21'38'') - we saw that in the discharges of Sellafield or in La Hague being passed into the sea (21'43'') - where it then drifted over many years with the currents (21'47'') [...] that if this water were not sea water, it could even be used as drinking water (21'53'').

Film speaker: But there is also the exact opposite opinion (21'56''). Professor Claus Grupen produced standard works on radiation protection (22'2''). Dilute contaminated water in the sea to a drinking water level - and everything is ok? (22'6'')


Atomic physicist Grupen (University of Siegen): The concentration will steadily increase

Claus Grupen (atomic physicist, University of Siegen): If the amount where that is diluted is infinitely large - if I put that into space (22'12''), then it may be very well diluted (22'15 '' ). But the earth is a very small celestial body, and we have a fixed amount: the earth has 5 times 10 to the power of 26 kg (22'22''), that remains, and the concentration will constantly increase (22'25'').


Claus Grupen, atomic physicist in Siegen (Germany) [45]

Film speaker: Our conclusion: the radioactivity could only be distributed but is not disappearing (22'33''). There is no precise information on the location and quantity of the barrels (22'39''). And: There is disagreement as to whether they should be recovered (22'46'').

  
Map: The entire Atlantic around GB is radioactive. The coasts of Great Britain, Ireland, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Scandinavia, Spain, Portugal, Morocco and Iceland are affected [46]


from 1951+1966: The "nuclear waste recycling plants" in Sellafield and La Hague with direct water pipes into the sea

[Europe built two "nuclear waste recycling plants" in Sellafield (northern England) and in La Hague (near the English Channel in France). Since 1951, Sellafield had installed the first unit for recycling atomic waste to which was added a second one in 1985 [web03]. Recycling plant of La Hague began in 1966 [web04]. BOTH nuclear waste recycling plants are contaminating the sea with atomically contaminated water passing it through criminal underground pipes. Greenpeace has also exposed THIS crime].

Film spokesman: In 1993 the dumping of nuclear waste in the sea was banned worldwide (23'4''). But the nuclear industry found other ways (23'7''). She no longer sinks barrels (23'13''). She built kilometers of underwater pipes from which radioactive wastewater now flows into the sea (23'20'').

Here is the underground line on the seabed at Sellafield (Northern England on the Irish Sea):

   
Sellafield, a water pipe on the seabed with radioactive water [47] - Sellafield, the end of the water pipe on the seabed with radioactive water [48]


France: The nuclear waste recycling plant from La Hague - the contaminated English Channel to Belgium, Holland and Germany

[Here is the underground radioactive wastewater pipe on the seabed near La Hague in France]:

Film speaker: One of these pipes is in Normandy [on the Atlantic coast of France] (23'32''). It comes from the French reprocessing plant La Hague (23'37'').


France: Map: La Hague on the Atlantic coast in France on the English Channel [49]


The nuclear waste recycling plant of La Hague [52]

Film spokesman: Greenpeace protested here too - under water (23'43'').

[Greenpeace prepared the end of the water pipe with a sign with the countries involved, which are customers of the nuclear waste recycling plant there at La Hague and are therefore responsible for the radioactive waste water in the English Channel: France F, Belgium B, Holland NL, Switzerland CH, Japan J, Germany D]:


La Hague (Western France): The pipe end of the radioactive sewage pipe of the nuclear waste reprocessing plant of La Hague with the customer countries France F, Belgium B, Holland NL, Switzerland CH, Japan J, Germany D [50]


La Hague (Western France): The pipe end of the radioactive waste water pipe of the nuclear waste reprocessing plant of La Hague with the customer countries France F, Belgium B, Holland NL, Switzerland CH, Japan J, Germany D, general view of the pipe end [51]

Film spokesman: For the environmentalists it is clear: This disposal by pipe destroys the environment, just like the dumping of barrels (24'0''). The advantage for the nuclear industry: No more negative headlines about the barrels (24'7''), because disposal by pipe remains hidden from the public (24'11'').


La Hague: activist David Boilley - radioactive fish and mussels at the fish market

Film speaker: La Hague is the disposal station for nuclear waste from all over Europe (24'17''). Germany's castor containers roll into Normandy [as also from Switzerland, from Holland, from Belgium etc.] (24'20''). But the residents here are no longer willing to accept the use of the sea as an atomic trash can (24'26'').


France: The nuclear waste recycling plant at La Hague [52]

Film speaker: David Boilley is a physicist, founder and chairman of an environmental protection group [Organization ACRO near Caen - link] (24'34''). Today he visits a local elementary school and tells the children about radioactivity, poisonous plutonium and nuclear waste (24'41''). David Boilley asks us to come along - to the fish market (24'51''). The physicist criticizes the criteria for assessing the health of marine animals (25'17''). Because since Fukushima you have to rethink (25'20''). One could no longer simply say: water clean - fish clean - fish healthy (25'27'').

  
La Hague: Activist David Boilley in a school class 01 [53] - La Hague: Activist David Boilley warns of radioactive fish at the fish market [54]

Physicist David Boilley (Organization ACRO): Some of the fish are contaminated, some are not (25'33''). Fish are more difficult to measure because they don't stay in one place (25'38''). That means: A fish could have been in a radioactively contaminated place, another time you will find something in mussels (25'44'').

Film team: What can you find in mussels? (25'47'')

Physicist David Boilley (Organization ACRO): You could find iodine or cobalt that comes from reprocessing or not (25'52''). It's like a game of chance, sometimes you're happy - sometimes unhappy (25'56'').

     
La Hague, fish market with radioactive fish [55] - La Hague, fish market with radioactive mussels [56]

Film spokesman: The toxic waste from the recycling atomic plant in La Hague has long ceased to be a local problem for the people in Normandy (26'4''). Marine pollution is a European problem - Boilley said (26'10'').

Physicist David Boilley (Organization ACRO): If you offset the damage with the benefit, the benefit is all in all ZERO (26'19''). Here on site jobs are created, but the damage to the environment is much greater (26'24''). This is all a big sin (26'26'').


[The radioactive water from La Hague is spreading more and more up to Germany. Soil samples in Belgium, Holland and Germany follow]:

Belgium 2013 approx .: Radioactivity on the beach in Ostend

Film speaker: Boilley is with us on the way to Ostend, Belgium, 400km from La Hague (26'37''). He wants to show us how far the radioactive poisons have already drifted (26'42''). Because their origin can be measured exactly (26'45'').

  
Belgium, the beach of Ostend (Oostende) [57]

Film speaker: He [Boilley] meets a Belgian activist - collecting [radioactively contaminated] seaweed (26'51''). The environmental activists distrust the measurements of the operators (26'54''). 

    
Ostend, seagrass samples 1,2 [58.59] [no protection suit nor gloves?]


Holland 2013 approx.: radioactivity on the beach - radioactive seaweed on the beach

Film speaker: Boilley continues with us to Holland (27'10''). Here, too, he wants to collect seaweed samples for his laboratory (27'13'').

  
Holland, a windmill [60]

  
Holland, a radioactive beach [61] - Holland: radioactive seagrass samples from a radioactive beach [62]


Wilhelmshafen (Germany): Radioactivity on the beach - radioactive seaweed on the beach

[The radioactivity from La Hague made it to Germany with the ocean currents in the English Channel: In Germany too, the seaweed is RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED].

Physicist David Boilley (Organization ACRO): I also have seaweed here from Germany (27'33''). That was sent to us by German friends from Wilhelmshafen (27'37''). We wanted to know whether radioactive iodine had drifted from La Hague to Germany, and our answer is (27'44''): Yes, we can find radioactive iodine in seaweed as far as Germany (27'47'').

  
Radioactive seaweed from a radioactive shore of Wilhelmshafen in Germany [63]

[The seagrass samples are evaluated in the laboratory of ACRO near Caen: EVERYTHING is RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED]:

Film speaker: We are back in the laboratories of ACRO, the citizens' initiative (27'57''). The seaweed that has just been brought here by volunteers has a tritium value 5 times higher than specified by the French operator AREVA [in La Hague, today Orano - year 2021] (28'7 "). Now it is clear why the citizens are measuring themselves (28'11''). David Boilley brought marine animals from the market. Pierre Barbey - a molecular biologist - explains to us what happens in the animals (28'24'').

Molecular biologist Pierre Barbey (Organization ACRO): We now know that there is an exchange between the deep sea and the upper water layers (28'36''). The radioactive poisons accumulate in the food chain (28'39''). This little worm here, for example, can have 2000 to 3000 times more radioactivity in itself than its environment (28'45''). It is eaten by the next larger creature, etc. (28'54'').

  
ACRO laboratory: The laboratory samples are unpacked [64] - Laboratory molecular biologist Barbey, from organisation of ACRO [65]

Molecular biologist Pierre Barbey (Organization ACRO): At the end of the food chain, we found damage to the sex cells in the crabs (28'59''). And this damage, these genetic defects are passed on from one generation to the next (29'5'').

Film team: And this genetic damage occurs in the same way in humans as it does in animals? (29'11'')

Molecular biologist Pierre Barbey (Organization ACRO): Yes, yes, an animal or human cell - that's the same thing (29'16'').

  
ACRO laboratory: The radioactive waste on the sea ground provokes genetic damage in marine animals up to and including humans, scheme [66]


England + France: Radioactive marine animals

[The radioactively contaminated seaweeds on the channel coasts of France, Belgium, Holland and Germany are an indication that all marine animals around England and France are also RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED].

Film speaker: Off the coasts of Europe, in gray seals you can find highly toxic plutonium (29'29''). Radioactive cesium is found in porpoises (29'37''). What effects this will have on future generations is unknown (29'47''). That is why marine biologists demand: EVERY animal must be protected from radioactivity (29'53'').

[This means: The Royal satanist authorities in London have to take out all atomic barrels from the sea together with other clients Switzerland, Holland, Belgium, Japan, France etc. - and the Atlantic has to be cleaned].

  
Atlantic and English Channel around Great Britain: gray seals are radioactively contaminated with plutonium [67] -
Atlantic and English Channel around Great Britain: Porpoises are contaminated with radioactive cesium [68]


GB: The Sellafield nuclear waste recycling plant in Northern England on sore of the Irish Sea

[The nuclear waste reprocessing plant of Sellafield is located in the "inner sea" ("Inland Sea") of Great Britain, on the Irish Sea, so that all of West England and the Irish east coast are affected by radioactive contamination]:

Film speaker: But how dangerous is nuclear waste in the sea for us humans? (30'7'') - We are looking for answers to this question in Great Britain - in Sellafield (30'13'') - because alarming reports come from there (30'16''). Here in the north of England is located just the SECOND disposal pipe for nuclear waste in Europe (30'22'').

  
Map with Sellafield in Northern England [69]


Sellafield (GB): The end of the discharge pipe for radioactive water on the seabed [70]

Film spokesman: And as in France, it was environmental activists from Greenpeace who drew attention to the pipe (30'34''). That was in 1997 (30'36''). Shaun Burnie, 35 years old at the time, was there (30'42''). For almost 2 decades the Briton has been fighting against discharges into the sea (30'57''). It is a fight for numbers, limit values - but also for the sovereignty of interpretation (31'4''). Burnie is worried about the people here on the coast (31'7''). The state had many of them examined (31'10'').

   
Coast near Sellafield: The residents are contaminated with plutonium [71] - Greenpeace activist Shaun Burnie, GB, tells how the coastal residents near Sellafield were tested: Even the teeth contain plutonium [72]

Shaun Burnie (Greenpeace): Here on the beach along the coast, many live in the small houses (31'22''). They belong to the so-called risk groups (31'25''). They live directly on the beach and are exposed to plutonium every day (31'31''). Their houses are full of plutonium dust (31'37''). Their bodies are radioactive (31'39''). They even have plutonium in their teeth (31'41''). And the closer they live to Sellafield, the more plutonium they have in their teeth (31'49'').


Sellafield (GB): The radioactive sewer pipe in the Irish Sea

Film speaker: The Sellafield pipe can only be seen clearly from the air (31'57''). But how could the waste disposal company circumvent the discharge ban? [in 1985?] (32'5'') - Nuclear waste is still being dumped into the sea (32'8''). The operators argue that it is land-based disposal and therefore legal (32'13''). The [English Royal satanist] authorities have approved it (32'15'').


The radioactive sewer pipe of the Sellafield nuclear waste reprocessing plant before submerging on the seabed, aerial photo [73]


The radioactive sewer pipe of the Sellafield nuclear waste reprocessing plant before immersion on the seabed 01 [74]


Monaco (second center of the Vatican Lodge P3): The IAEA also operates "philosophy" instead of changing to protect nature!


Film team: Is there a scientific and logical reason why barrels are forbidden and discharges are allowed? (32'25'')

Hartmut Nies (IAEA in Monaco - [second seat of the Vatican box P3]): I think that's a more philosophical question. (32'29'')


Wolfgang Renneberg on Sellafield's radioactive sewer pipe: It's all about profit

Film speaker: For him this is NOT a philosophical question (32'33''). Wolfgang Renneberg was head of the reactor safety department in the Federal Environment Ministry  [in Germany] (32'39'') and is an expert in the disposal of radioactive waste (32'42'').

Wolfgang Renneberg (reactor safety in the Federal Environment Ministry): Yes, there is no logical reason for this (32'46''). Ultimately, there are only ECONOMIC REASONS (32'49''). The question is how expensive it would be, for example, to install appropriate filter systems (32'57'') that would ensure that such a discharge is close to ZERO (33'3''). Possibly then this system would no longer pay off (33'7''). THAT is behind it. Physical or other reasons cannot be identified here (33'14'').


Wolfgang Renneberg, ex-director of the Ministry for Nuclear Safety in Germany [75]


The radioactive sewer pipe of the Sellafield nuclear waste reprocessing plant before immersion on the seabed 02 [76]

Film speaker: Every day radioactive liquid flows into the Irish Sea here (33'20''). Nowadays [in 2013 appr.] the nuclear waste from Sellafield is now found on the Norwegian coast (33'28''). To the other side, on the beaches around Sellafield safety is simulated (33'37'').


The Sellafield nuclear waste recycling plant, general view [77]


Sellafield's radioactive beach - officially defined as a "clean beach" by the satanist Royals

Film spokesman: The Sellafield employees are showing presence (33'41''). Operators and authorities assure that there is NO risk (33'44''). There are controls and checkings permanently (33'48''). But they find plutonium here - every day (33'53''). Here, too, the poison returns from the sea (33'56''). [On the beach the plutonium] is washed out, it dries, and it's on the beach (33'59''). The people here have long suspected that the dangers are greater than the [satanist Royal] responsible admit (34'5'').

Residents of the Sellafield region: We will not change the course of events here (34'11''). Those are the "big ones up there" (34'13''). But I've also never heard scary details (34'16''). Yes, information could be kept under the covers (34'19''). But before I don't know anymore ... (34'22'') - The sea is polluted all over the world (34'24'').

Film speaker: The beach at Sellafield has been named one of the cleanest in England (34'33''). Every day a "ground hog" - a small excavator - has to remove plutonium from the beach (34'42''). [The excavator driver is WITHOUT a protective suit]. The scanner [of the excavator] locates small, radiating particles down to a depth of 30cm (34'47''). The operator of Sellafield has dumped a total of more than 500kg plutonium into the sea in the past decades (34'57'') [since 1951?]


Sellafield (GB): A plutonium buggy works on the beach every day [78]


Sellafield Region (UK): Radioactive fish - cancer and leukemia everywhere

Film spokesman: A woman from the Netherlands has lived in the hinterlands of Sellafield for many decades: Janine Allis-Smith (35'32''). For them it is certain that the British [satanic Royal] authorities downplay the problem with radioactivity (35'38''). And she is also convinced that the plutonium from Sellafield made her little son sick years ago: leukemia-ill (35'48'').

Sellafield region: The mother Janine Allis Smith tells of a boy with leukemia [79]

The sandy beach of Sellafield: children play with radioactive sand - leukemia boy commits suicide

Janine Allis-Smith (Sellafield region): We loved going to the beach and often (35'53''). We had a long summer vacation and like all babies he took the sand in his hands, rubbed it into his hair (35'59''), put it in his mouth (36'1''). At 12 he got leukemia (36'4''). I realized that my son wasn't the only one (36'9''). There were other children who were sick (36'11''). Donald. He was diagnosed with leukemia at an early age, but it got better (36'15''). When the cancer broke out again at 19, he hanged himself (36'19'').


Sellafield region: The mother Janine Allis Smith tells of a boy with leukemia [79]

Article by News Star: Ronald found hanged at 19: Tragic death of 'inspirational' Workington teenager who fought cancer (36'19'').

Or Jemma: She died at 7 after a bone marrow transplant of an infection (36'30'').

Article: Leukemia 'link' aids nuclear fight (36'24'')




Sellafield region (GB): Local television reports on leukemia children

Film spokesman: Local television reported as early as the 1980s on children with leukemia (36'50''). For the journalists it was clear that the operator [satanists of Sellafield] - even the [Royal] health authorities - deny the true extent of the dangers (36'56''). Three schoolgirls in Seascale alone contracted leukemia (37'1'') - in a single elementary school class (37'4''). The intensive reporting of the local broadcaster "Yorkshire TV" could not stop the sewege tubes (37'10'').

[Wo we have: Workington -- Seascale -- Yorkshire TV]


Sellafield region: children with blood cancer leukemia, a list on GB-TV 1980s, perhaps Yorkshire TV [80]


The Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant, GB-TV 1980s, perhaps Yorkshire TV  [81]


Yorkshire TV (original speaker of the 1980s):  The radioactivity here can be measured quite simple with a Geiger counter (37'16''). It's in the mud and it's on the beach (37'20''). Scientist Dr. Philipp Day is measuring this radioactivity pollution (37'24'').


Sellafield (GB): The Geiger counter on the beach shows radioactive radiation and rattles (in the 1980s!) [82]


Sellafield (GB): Bathers play on the radioactive beach of Sellafield, also in the radioactive mud (in the 1980s!) [83]


Filmsprecher: Wir versuchen zu recherchieren, was an den Berichten dran ist (37'30''). Rund um die Wiederaufbereitungsanlage Sellafield herrscht striktes Drehverbot (37'35'').

[Sellafield wird also wie ein militärisches Territorium geheimgehalten].

Sellafield spokesman 2013 approx.: The radioactivity and the leukemia children have nothing to do with the nuclear sewege pipe

Film spokesman: We try to research what is true of the reports (37'30''). There is a strict filming ban around the Sellafield reprocessing plant (37'35'').

[So Sellafield is kept secret by the satanist Royals like a NATO military territory - and that's it: radioactivity is a weapon for reducing the population - but see next]:

Film spokesman: Recordings on the company's territory are not possible (37'38''). We can't even get to the pipe (37'40''). An interview appointment turns out to be difficult (37'43''). Finally, we meet in the parking lot in front of the facility (37'47''). The question is: What is the connection between radioactive waste and leukemia cases? (37'52'')


Sellafield (GB): Parking lot sign [84]

Tim Parker (Sellafield Ltd.): Well, the leukemia story is difficult (38'0''). The diseases have been examined for years by the British health authorities, i.e. by exactly the right people [satanists, Committee of 300!] (38'7''). They say the increased leukemia rate in Sellafield is NOT related to our activities [dumping radioactive water into the sea and radioactively contaminating the beach] (38'12'').

"cannot be due to our operations." (38'16'').


Sellafield (UK): Tim Parker claims that the children's leukemia in the Sellafield area was not caused by the reprocessing plant [85]


Sellafield beach remains open!

Film spokesman: With this justification, the beach remains accessible - despite the plutonium finds (38'23''). However, it has long been assumed in scientific circles that chronic poisoning can cause cancer even with low radiation doses (38'31'').


Sellafield region: Soil samples on the river 10km inland: everything is radioactively contaminated

[The film team goes with Janine Allis-Smith and the Greenpeace activist Shaun Burnie to a river 10 km inland to take soil samples from the river bank where the seawater reaches at high tide: Everything is highly contaminated].

  
Greenpeace activist Shaun Burnie, GB [72] - Sellafield region: The mother Janine Allis Smith [79]

Film speaker: We drove 10km inland into the interior (38'37''), because the poison can also be found here (38'40''). The radiation is significantly increased on this river bank (38'44''). That shows us Janine and Shaun Burnie (38'46'').

[So they are all WITHOUT protective suits and taking soil samples with their bare hands - is extremely dangerous. The soil samples are actually nuclear waste!]

The Geiger counter on the river bank: 30 decays per second

[First it is measured on the street - 10 decays per second. And then on the river bank the water plants are measured - 30 decays per second]:

Janine: It's going up slightly - Here it goes up slowly (38'51''), to around 30 decays per second (38'53''). That means, here the radiation is 3 times higher than back there on the street (38'58'').

Film spokesman: And this at a point that is freely accessible to the public (39'6''). A bridle path leads directly along the river bank (39'13''). John Burnie and Janine Alice-Smith criticize the [satanist Royal] authorities (39'19''): Their work is unprecise on purpose (39'23'').

John Burnie: When the authorities here take samples and measure - if at all - they just take ONE sample (39'31'').

Janine: They just want to know what happens from year to year (39'36''). They are not interested in what was deposited here 50 years ago (39'40''). They want to conceal the thing. But the stuff is there (39'43'').

John Burnie: They don't take samples from the deep (39'48''). They just scratch the surface (39'50''). Only a few samples are taken (39'53''). All of this is on purpose so that they get THE results they want (39'56''). They are not interested in public health (39'58'').

Film spokesman: The authorities did not even measure plutonium at this point (40'5''). We take a soil sample with us (40'8'') and - back in Germany - will have it evaluated at the University of Mainz (40'13''). The result will be alarming (40'15''). The amount of plutonium will be ten times the permissible limit (40'21'').


University of Mainz: Considerations about the Sellafield region - Prof. Wakeford (University of Manchester) belittles radioactivity

Film speaker: How dangerous is it to live in Sellafield? (40'29'') - Not particularly, thinks Professor Richard Wakeford from the University of Manchester (40'37''). He is often quoted by the operators (40'41'') - and, after having worked for the nuclear industry for almost 30 years [and being bribed well for sure], is considered one of the leaders for radiation risks (40'48'').

Richard Wakeford (handyman in the nuclear industry, University of Manchester): You know, whether you are flying in an airplane or getting the radiation in Sellafield, both risks are very low (41'3''). Parents or others shouldn't worry about that (41'6'').

[But children put the radioactive sand in their mouth and play with it every day for many years. It would be like if the children would fly 6 hours every sunny day at a height of 10 km!]

Prof. Wakeford INVENTS new causes for leukemia

Richard Wakeford (helper in the nuclear industry, University of Manchester): There are TWO possible causes that worry me (41'10''). Either childhood leukemia is triggered by a rare, quite widespread infection, the pathogen of which we do not yet know (41'17''), or leukemia breaks out where large urban and rural populations have mixed (41'24''). There is statistically convincing evidence for this (41'27'').

Film speaker: Conclusion: Therefore a virus should be the cause - or the mixing of the population around Sellafield are "responsible" for cancer? (41'38'') - But not the highly toxic nuclear waste from the sea? (41'41'')


Epidemiologist Hoffmann (University of Greifswald): The nuclear industry INVENTS theses with new causes of leukemia in order to conceal the radioactivity

Film spokesman: We are irritated and ask a German expert, the physician Hoffmann, member of the radiation protection commissions of the federal government (41'51''). We meet the busy scientist in a hotel in the town of Bonn (41'55'').

Film team: What do you say when the British experts stand up and say (42'1''): These connections do not exist (42'3'').

Wolfgang Hoffmann (epidemiologist, University of Greifswald): Yes, they are not right (42'6''). Scientifically, the status is quite clear: There is little evidence for the population mixing hypothesis (42'11''), and there is also no evidence at all for the virus hypothesis (42'14''), on the contrary: In child leukemia has been tried for many decades to prove an infectious genesis (42'20''). There is neither a virus nor antibodies (42'23''). That means, this infection hypothesis has to be dropped (42'26''). These are hypotheses that essentially came up in order to discuss the radiation risk away (42'33'').

Film speaker: Radiation risks are no longer discussed away in internal IAEA papers (42'39''). Here we read from
-- Advantages (42'42'')
-- Low energy costs (42'43'')
-- Workplaces (42'44'').

But here is also recorded what Professor Wakeford denies (42'49''):

"Sickness and Suffering - Deformities and Physical Handicaps - Life Shortening and Early Death" (42'53'')

Cancer is mentioned as a cause (42'58''): Leukemia - CNS Cancer - Bone Tumor - Thyroid Cancer - Lung Carcinoma (43'2'').


Children's Cancer Clinic in Wales: Increasing childhood leukemia

[The film shows a children's hospital and child without hair]:

Film speaker: These are private video recordings from a children's cancer station in Wales (43'9''). Professor Chris Busby sent them to us (43'13''). Doctors have registered a steady increase in childhood leukemia over the past few decades (43'37''). For the little ones, the treatment is an ordeal (43'41''). One is convinced that the leukemia comes from Sellafield (43'46''). Chris Busby therefore asked us to visit him again (43'50'').


Sellafield region: leukemia rate 10 times higher than in the rest of England - reaction of the satanic royals: cancer registry is closed!

Film speaker: Together with his colleague Richard Bramhall, he [Chris Busby] tells us an incredible story (43'59''). The cancer rates around Sellafield are 10 times higher than in the rest of the country (44'6'').

Richard Bramhall: They do EVERYTHING to suppress the truth (44'10''). But we got leaked material, numbers from the Welsh cancer registry (44'14''). Maybe someone had a guilty conscience (44'16'').

Chris Busby: Yes, in the end it was the employees of the Welsh cancer registry who gave us the exact data (44'25''), down to the individual localities (44'28''). As Richard says: We don't know whether it was an accident that they gave us these data, or intentional (44'34''). At least we were able to calculate that there is a 10-fold increased leukemia rate (44'42''). After they gave us the data, the whole department was closed (44'46 ") - the woman who gave us the data [was] fired (44'49").

[Firing people who is telling the truth - this is banking policy and the policy of the satanist Royals of London and of the Committee of 300 - which is in the City of London where the banks are].


The satanist House of Lords refuses to give the child cancer numbers

Film spokesman: A short time ago, the House of Lords refused to publish current childhood cancer figures - [with the protective claim]: data protection (44'59''). And the nuclear industry? She weighs up cancer and costs (45'6''). Quote:

"The effort to protect people from radiation exposure should also include cost factors." Source: ICRP (45'11'')

Filmsprecher: Kann das wirklich sein? [Das] wollen wir vom britischen Gesundheitsamt wissen (45'22'').

John Cooper: Um die Strahlendosis noch weiter zu reduzieren, müsste man übertrieben viel Geld investieren (45'32''), das anderswo besser verwendet wäre (45'35''). Es geht hier um eine Abwägung (45'36'').


London Health Department (HPA): The nuclear industry can do what they want - leukemia children are accepted (!)

Film speaker: Can that really be? [That] we want to know from the British Health Department (45'22'').


John Cooper: To reduce the radiation dose even further, one would have to invest an excessive amount of money (45'32'') that would be better used elsewhere (45'35''). It is a matter of weighing up (45'36'').

Film team: Does that mean: you accept a certain number of cancer deaths due to the radiation dose? (45'43'') - So that the costs of discharging atmospheric waste into the sea remain as low as possible? (45'47'')

John Cooper: YOU draw this comparison (45'52'').

Film team: I quote from documents (45'54'').

John Cooper: That's exactly what is ALSO happening in many other parts of society (45'58'').

Film speaker: Where do such cost-benefit considerations come from? (46'4'')


London's corruption: The ICRP is just a facade - the satanist Royal cost-benefit principle of the English "radiation protection" - Epicurus

Film spokesperson: During our research we came across the influential ICRP (46'8''), the International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP (46'12'')

The group operates as an independent charity for the benefit of the public (46'18''). A request for an interview with the chairwoman (Claire Cousins, chairwoman since 2009) is rejected (46'24''). [There's another ex-chairman: Roger Clarke].

But on the Internet we find a lesson from the former chairman Roger Clarke (46'31''). He explains the cost-benefit principle (46'35''). Clarke quotes Epicurus' ethics of utility (46'41''). [This is classic Darwinism with the majority that is allowed to destroy the minority]:

"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few." (46'47'')

Insiders tell us that the ICRP is the extended arm of the nuclear industry (46'54''). On the website we also discover the name of Professor Wakeford (46'59''), the "expert" from the University of Manchester (47'2''). To our surprise we also find the name of John Coopers, the employee of the British HPA [British satanist health department] (47'10'').


Royal London's Corruption: Visit to Cooper (UK Health Department HPA)

[The film team asks Cooper]:

Film team: You work for the health authority (47'16''). At the same time you are a member of the ICRP (47'19''). That means, the responsible head of the authority receives security recommendations from himself (47'24''). That's a conflict of interest (47'28'').


John Cooper (UK Satanist Health Department HPA): Yes, a conflict of interest. That is a problem (47'32'').


John Large (Atomexperte): Die HPA ist die ICRP (47'39'). Die ICRP besteht aus Regierungsstellen (47'42''), aus Regierungsmitarbeitern (47'43''). Die ICRP ist keine grosse, unabhängige Einrichtung. Sie besteht auch aus Leuten von der britischen Gesundheitsbehörde, die zu Treffen der ICRP gehen (47'52''), und legen dort die Standards fest (47'54'').


Satanist London: Health Department HPA = "Protection Organization" ICRP = Nuclear Industr


John Large (atomic physicist cientist): The HPA is the ICRP (47'39 '). The ICRP consists of government agencies (47'42'') and government employees (47'43''). The ICRP is not a large, independent body. It also consists of people from the British Health Authority who go to meetings of the ICRP (47'52'') and set the standards there (47'54'').

Speaker: Even former Environment Minister Meacher (1939-2015 [web05]) has to confess to be without power (48'1'').


Michael Meacher (UK Environment Minister 1997-2003 under Blair): When I was a Minister, my staff members were anything but happy when I brought in people like Chris Busby or John Large (48'11''). My own authority did NOT want any dispute, NO discussion or debate (48'16''). If I had managed to have such an open, honest discussion, one would have felt much more comfortable (48'24''). But they wanted to work with the official standards (48'27''). And ultimately they finally to the requirements of the nuclear industry (48'31'').

Film spokesman: Even the former British Environment Minister Meacher has to admit his impotence (48'1'').


Sellafield region with mass death of leukemia children on a "popular beach"

  
Greenpeace activist Shaun Burnie, GB [72] - Sellafield region: The mother Janine Allis Smith [79]

Film speaker: And on site? Shaun and Janine have had frustrating experiences for years (48'40''). Nobody speaks openly (48'42''). The environmental fighter and the mother of a son suffering from leukemia fight against windmills (48'47'').

Janine Allis-Smith (Sellafield region): This is now a very sad place (48'52''). People used to like to come here, on trains, from all parts of the country (48'57'').

Shaun Burnie: I'm pissed off that the [satanic Royal] authorities caused this nuclear disaster for decades [since 1951], here along the coast (49'9''). And most of the people here don't know about it or close their eyes (49'14''). You cannot influence anything either (49'16''). The decisions are made in distant [satanist Royal] London (49'19'').

[The sacrifice: humans and house values - only London always wins
The Satanist queen has decided to sacrifice part of the population, not only in Sellafield, because they want the population reduction. Take a look at the queen's account balance: she owns 1/3 of the values of Britain and her colonial empire. At the same time, the population does not speak anything because they fear falling vallues of their houses (!) which is also caused by the Satanic Queen of London by distributing radioactivity (!)]

The satanic nuclear industry does NOT want to name perpetrators, does NOT want to bring up nuclear barrels, does NOT want to COMPENSATE!

Film spokesman: Sellafield and La Hague show that disposal into the sea was and is a mistake (49'32''). But from the official [satanist Royal] side hardly anyone wants to admit that (49'35''). Because then you would have to deal with difficult questions (49'38''). WHO lied? WHAT can still be saved? (49'41'') - And WHO should pay for it? (49'43'')

From the dumping areas of the North Atlantic to high up on Norway's coast (49'49''). The nuclear waste from long times ago [since 1940 appr.] with barrels and pipes is a consciously denied problem (49'58''). It could only be solved by closing the pipes and salvaging the intact barrels [and first the rusted barrels!] wherever possible (50'8''). [This will work with robot submarines with gripper arms].


Logos from arte and SWR [86]


Conclusions of the translator and historian

1) Tesis of population reduction by Sellafield Recycling Plant on a "popular beach" - with FULL INTENTION
WHY was the Sellafield Nuclear Waste Recycling Plant built on a popular beach? Probably in order to contaminate as MANY people as possible and to TARGETLY cause as MUCH cancer as possible, so that research and hospitals have "work", and for POPULATION REDUCTION - the satanist Royal program.

2) Tony Blair was just another satanist
Tony Blair did NOT take the atomic barrels out - but made war in Iraq with uranium ammunition - Blair is also just a satanist Royal puppet!]

3) The Atlantic from Morocco to Norway is a radioactive soup - ban on shipping - bring up barrels with robotic submarines
Actually, shipping should be banned in radioactive seas! Facts: On the beaches you can find stontium, cesium, plutonium. The sea of Europe is a RADIOACTIVE SOUP. Shipping should be banned there. And the royals have to get all the barrels out - this goes with robotic submarines. And England has a lot of wave energy and flow energy - UNNOTICED until today - England actually does NOT need atomic energy at all - as also France and other countries with a sea coast! So it's proven that atomic energy is a pure MADNESS OF DESTRUCTION for a population reduction!

Michael Palomino, April 7, 2021